Open Access
Table 1
Literature summary related to life cycle costing.
Ref | Data source | Duration of data | Number of plants studied | Specification | Parameters considered | Major findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[10] | Bangladesh’s subdistricts of Paba in the Rajshahi district and Kalihati, Ghatail, and Bhuapur in the Tangail district | 2016–2017 | 20 | 40, 50, 65, 75, 85 Wp | Energy payback time, cost payback period | 6.53 and 7.57 years energy payback time, cost payback period 2.55–4.03 years |
[29] | Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and New Delhi | 2010–2020 | 06 | 3.3 MW, 1 MW, 10 MW, 15 MW, 10 MW, 5 MW | LCOE, LCE, LCC | The project’s payback duration is less than 8 years, and it depends on the initial investment and the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) rate. Techno-economic viability is strong in India. |
[13] | ISO standards-based advice obtained from China’s typical photovoltaic enterprises | single | 200 Wp multi-crystalline silicon (multi-Si) m | Energy payback time and primary energy demand (EPBT) | Best-suited areas in China were proposed for installation. | |
[12] | Building rooftop in Singapore | 1 year | 36 | 2.7 kWp, monocrystalline | LCA, EPBT, LCCA | Fossil energy use and GHG emission factors were taken into account for LCA and LCCA |
[11] | Malaysia | 30 years | – | 100 kWp CdTe PV (cadmium telluride photovoltaic) | Potential for global warming, use of fossil fuels, energy payback period, and CO2 payback period | There is a 0.94-year energy payback time and a 0.76-year CO2 payback time. The CdTe PV system has a higher energy return on investment than the Si system, and environmental factors are taken into account in the life cycle assessment. |
[37] | China company, literature | – | – | mcSi | Environmental impact | Environmental impact: the shift in environmental impacts linked to the export of Chinese photovoltaic modules made of multi-crystalline silicon is considered. |
[38] | 2 years | – | 3 kWp rooftop silicon PV plant | Repowering time (ecotoxicity, freshwater, land and resource usage, minerals, metals, climate change) | For the PV installations under investigation, the optimal repowering period is estimated to be between 15 and 21 years on average. | |
[9] | Southern India is warm and humid | 1 year | 3,773 panels | 1 MW rooftop, mono-crystalline | LCCA, net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), simple payback period (SPP), and discounted payback period (DPP) | The payback period lengthens by 70–120%, and the actual power generated is roughly one-third less than ideal. |
[8] | Iran (Tehran and Bandar Abbas) | – | – | 3 kWp, Taiwan, polycrystalline | LCCA based on the payback period | The PV system’s payback period is mostly influenced by its maintenance expenses; when current power rates and initial costs are taken into account, the payback period of PV systems is longer than their technical life span. |
[39] | Phoenix, Arizona | 7700 | c-Si | Energy payback time | Environmental indicators such as emissions, land transformation, and water withdrawal were investigated in terms of LCC. | |
[40] | Field data from the Indian industry | 20 | m-Si, p-Si | GHG emission rate, energy return on investment (EROI), and energy payback time (EPBT) | Three phases of solar PV systems are considered: production, construction, and operation. | |
[34] | Solar plant in Bhubaneswar | 1 year | 80 panels | 30.24 kW | Payback period | A machine learning model for solar power prediction was developed, and the LCC of the rooftop plant was calculated. |
[29] | Solar plants in Karnataka, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, New Delhi and Rajasthan | – | 6 panels | 3.3 MW, 1 MW, 10 MW, 15 MW, 10 MW | Payback period | For a project with a life cycle of about 25 years, the payback period is usually shorter than 8 years. |
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.