Table 5
Different types of solar PV technologies for floating solar application.
| Panel type | Average efficiency | Typical lifespan | Key advantages | Key disadvantages | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monocrystalline | 18–24% | 25–40 years | Highest efficiency, space-efficient | Higher cost | [55] |
| Polycrystalline | 13–16% | 25–30 years | Lower cost | Less efficient | [56] |
| Thin-Film | 7–13% | 10–20 years | Flexible, lightweight | Lowest efficiency | [57] |
| PERC | Up to 25% | 25–40 years | Better performance in low light | Higher cost than standard mono | [58] |
| Transparent | 1–10% | ~25 years | Aesthetic integration | Very low efficiency | [59] |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.