Table 2
Comparison between traditional smart grid and IoT-enabled smart grid.
| Features | Traditional smart grid | IoT-enabled smart grid |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity and communication | Limited to proprietary or standardized protocols. | Utilizes internet protocols (IP) for seamless device communication. |
| Data exchange and analytics | Data collection primarily for monitoring and basic analysis. | Advanced data analytics for predictive maintenance and optimization. |
| Scalability and flexibility | Limited scalability and flexibility due to rigid architectures. | Greater scalability and flexibility for integrating new devices. |
| Real-time monitoring and control | Provides real-time monitoring and control, but may be limited. | Granular real-time monitoring and control of diverse grid assets. |
| Cybersecurity and privacy | Requires robust cybersecurity measures. | Faces additional cybersecurity challenges due to device complexity. |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.