Table 1
Comparison between this paper and related works.
Method | Typical case | Advantage | Disadvantage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPCC method | Ouyangbin [4]Lu [5] | High facetedness, High transparency, Strong traceability, Wide applicability | High data requirements, Not applicable to small-scale projects, Lack of flexibility | ||
Actual measurement | Zhou [6] | High accuracy, Wide applicability, Sustainability assessment | Costly, Data uncertainty, High degree of restriction | ||
Material conservation method | Yan [10] | Simple and easy to follow, High comprehensiveness, Wide applicability | High data uncertainty, Difficult to quantify indirect emissions, High limitations | ||
Carbon footprinting | Zhao [8]Shang [9] | Full in terms of assessment, Highly comparable | High data demand, High data uncertainty, Scope limitations | ||
Carbon flow approach | Zhang [11] | High accuracy, Strong tracking capability, Wide applicability | High data demand, High data uncertainty, High complexity | ||
Ref | Objective functions | Solution procedure | DSM strategy | Advantage | Disadvantage |
[13] | Environment, Cost, Power | Multi approach | Load curtailment, Load shifting | The ε-constraint method guarantees a set of non-inferior solutions to the multi-objective problem | High demands on computing resources and time |
[14] | Environment, Cost, Requirement | Multi approach | Demand curtailment, Demand shifting, Onsite generation | Optimization problems for complex systems with simultaneous consideration of multiple objectives | High computational complexity |
[15] | Environment, Cost, Deviation | Epsilon-constraint method | Load shifting | Handling multiple conflicting objectives, applicable to various types of optimization problems | Calculation costs increase with the number of targets |
[16] | Environment, Cost, Optimal shifting | Augmented epsilon-constraint | Optimal shifting and Strategic conversion as reserve | Efficient generation of multiple non-inferior solutions, flexible and independent | Computational costs increase with problem size |
[17] | Cost, Emission, LOLE, Deviation | Epsilon-constraint method | Optimal shifting | Combined consideration of multiple conflicting objectives; ε-constraint method ensures a non-inferior solution set for multi-objective problems; improved practicality and robustness against renewable energy uncertainty | Computational complexity, subjectivity, and limitations in accuracy and efficiency when dealing with high-complexity uncertainties in large-scale systems |
This paper | Cost, Emission, Deviation | Carbon emission measurement method of regional power system based on LSTM-Attention model | Optimal shifting | The support system has a comprehensive understanding of the distribution trajectory of carbon emissions in the power system; combined with neural networks, it can predict the fluctuation of carbon emissions over time | High data quality and quantity requirements and high consumption of computing resources |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.