Numéro |
Sci. Tech. Energ. Transition
Volume 80, 2025
Decarbonizing Energy Systems: Smart Grid and Renewable Technologies
|
|
---|---|---|
Numéro d'article | 27 | |
Nombre de pages | 22 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2024114 | |
Publié en ligne | 27 février 2025 |
Regular Article
Floating solar sustainability on land and ocean: A strategic assessment using SWOT-TWOS-PESTLE analysis
1
Faculty of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
2
Centre for Research in Advanced Fluid & Processes (Fluid Centre), Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, 26300, Paya Basar, Pahang, Malaysia
3
Centre for Automotive Engineering (Automotive Centre), Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
4
Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
5
Energy Centre, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology Bhopal, 462003, Madhya Pradesh, India
6
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Zihni Derin Campus, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100 Rize, Turkey
7
School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK
8
Algorithm Intelligence, SRL, 14 Prevederii St., 032302 Bucharest, Romania
9
Energy Storage Rights, 19 Moore St, Turner ACT 2612, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
* Corresponding author: sudhakar@ump.edu.my
Received:
13
May
2024
Accepted:
28
December
2024
Floating Solar Projects (FSP) offer a revolutionary approach to harnessing solar energy, with the potential to address land-use constraints and tap into the expansive resources both on land and ocean surfaces. This paper conducts a comparative analysis of land-based and ocean-based Floating Solar PhotoVoltaic (FSPV) deployments using SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats), TOWS (a strategic approach based on SWOT), and PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental) analysis. We identify the unique strengths and weaknesses of each approach, such as land-based FSP’s easier implementation versus ocean-based FSP’s potential for large-scale generation. The TOWS matrix further develops strategic options for leveraging these differences, while the PESTLE analysis assesses the political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors that will shape the success of each deployment. Additionally, the analysis highlights the abundance of opportunities for FSPV systems, particularly in terms of policy and economic support, contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and technological advancements. This comprehensive assessment provides critical insights for stakeholders aiming to implement FSPV strategically, driving the transition toward a sustainable energy future.
Key words: Floating solar / SWOT analysis / TOWS matrix / PESTLE analysis / Land-use constraints / Sustainable energy
© The Author(s), published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.