Impact prediction model of acetone at various ignition advance by artificial neural network and response surface methodology techniques for spark ignition engine | Science and Technology for Energy Transition (STET)

Open Access

Issue		Sci. Tech. Energ. Transition Volume 77, 2022


Article Number		7
Number of page(s)		14
DOI		https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2022010
Published online		17 May 2022

Gülüm M., Bilgin A. (2016) Two-term power models for estimating kinematic viscosities of different biodiesel-diesel fuel blends, Fuel Process. Technol. 149, 121–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yesilyurt M.K., Eryilmaz T., Arslan M. (2018) A comparative analysis of the engine performance, exhaust emissions and combustion behaviors of a compression ignition engine fuelled with biodiesel/diesel/1-butanol (C4 alcohol) and biodiesel/diesel/n-pentanol (C5 alcohol) fuel blends, Energy 165, Part B, 1332–1351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Perera F., Ashrafi A., Kinney P., Mills D. (2019) Towards a fuller assessment of benefits to children’s health of reducing air pollution and mitigating climate change due to fossil fuel combustion, Environ. Res. 172, 55–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Vignesh P., Kumar A.R.P., Ganesh N.S., Jayaseelan V., Sudhakar K. (2021) Biodiesel and green diesel generation: An overview, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 76, 6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Venkatesan B., Seeniappan K., Shanmugam E., Subramanian S., Veerasundaram J. (2021) Characterization and effect of the use of safflower methyl ester and diesel blends in the compression ignition engine, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 76, 29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yılmaz E. (2019) Investigation of the effects of diesel-fusel oil fuel blends on combustion, engine performance and exhaust emissions in a single cylinder compression ignition engine, Fuel 255, 115741. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Polverino P., D’Aniello F., Arsie I., Pianese C. (2019) Study of the energetic needs for the on-board production of Oxy-Hydrogen as fuel additive in internal combustion engines, Energy Convers. Manage. 179, 114–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fayad M.A., Tsolakis A., Martos F.J. (2020) Influence of alternative fuels on combustion and characteristics of particulate matter morphology in a compression ignition diesel engine, Renew. Energy 149, 962–969. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Saravanan P., Mala D., Jayaseelan V., Kumar N.M. (2019) Experimental performance investigation of Partially Stabilized Zirconia coated low heat rejection diesel engine with waste plastic oil as a fuel, Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization & Env. Effects, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1683647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Balu P., Saravanan P., Jayaseelan V. (2021) Effect of ceramic coating on the performance, emission, and combustion characteristics of ethanol DI diesel engine, Mater. Today: Proc. 39, 4, 1259–1264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dogan B., Cakmak A., Yesilyurt M.K., Erol D. (2020) Investigation on 1-heptanol as an oxygenated additive with diesel fuel for compression-ignition engine applications: An approach in terms of energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, enviroeconomic, and sustainability analyses, Fuel 275, 117973. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Geo V.E., Godwin J., Thiyagarajan S., Saravanan C.G., Aloui F. (2019) Effect of higher and lower order alcohol blending with gasoline on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of SI engine, Fuel 256, 115806. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Liu W., Shadloo M.S., Tlili I., Maleki A., Bach Q. (2020) The effect of alcohol–gasoline fuel blends on the engines’ performances and emissions, Fuel 276, 117977. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kalwar A., Singh A.P., Agarwal A.K. (2020) Utilization of primary alcohols in dual-fuel injection mode in a gasoline direct injection engine, Fuel 276, 118068. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ayad S.M.M.E., Belchior C.R.P., da Silva G.L.R., Lucena R.S., Carreira E.S., de Miranda P.E.V. (2020) Analysis of performance parameters of an ethanol fueled spark ignition engine operating with hydrogen enrichment, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 8, 5588–5606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Prasad B.S.N., Pandey J.K., Kumar G.N. (2020) Impact of changing compression ratio on engine characteristics of an SI engine fueled with equi-volume blend of methanol and gasoline, Energy 191, 116605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sharudin H., Abdullah N.R., Najafi G., Mamat R., Masjuki H.H. (2017) Investigation of the effects of iso-butanol additives on spark ignition engine fuelled with methanol-gasoline blends, Appl. Therm. Eng. 114, 593–600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tang Q., Jiang P., Peng C., Chang H., Zhao Z. (2021) Comparison and analysis of the effects of spark timing and lambda on a high-speed spark ignition engine fuelled with n-butanol/gasoline blends, Fuel 287, 119505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Uslu S., Celik M.B. (2020) Combustion and emission characteristics of isoamyl alcohol-gasoline blends in spark ignition engine, Fuel 262, 116496. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Aydoğan B. (2020) Combustion characteristics, performance and emissions of an acetone/n-heptane fuelled Homogenous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engine, Fuel 275, 117840. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rao D.C.K., Karmakar S., Som S.K. (2017) Puffing and Micro-Explosion Behavior in Combustion of Butanol/Jet A-1 and Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol (A–B–E)/Jet A-1 Fuel Droplets, Combust. Sci. Technol. 189, 10, 1796–1812. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Elfasakhany A. (2020) Gasoline engine fueled with bioethanol-bio-acetone-gasoline blends: Performance and emissions exploration, Fuel 274, 117825. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Calam A. (2020) Study on the combustion characteristics of acetone/n-heptane blend and RON50 reference fuels in an HCCI engine at different compression ratios, Fuel 271, 117646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kumar A.N., Kishore P.S., Raju K.B., Ashok B., Vignesh R., Jeevanantham A.K., Nanthagopal K., Tamilvanan A. (2020) Decanol proportional effect prediction model as additive in palm biodiesel using ANN and RSM technique for diesel engine, Energy 213, 119072. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Inayat M., Sulaiman S.A., Kurnia J.C. (2018) Catalytic co-gasification of coconut shells and oil palm fronds blends in the presence of cement, dolomite, and limestone: Parametric optimization via Box Behnken Design, J. Energy Inst. 92, 4, 871–882. [Google Scholar]
Niu X., Yang C., Wang H., Wang Y. (2016) Investigation of ANN and SVM based on limited samples for performance and emissions prediction of a CRDI-assisted marine diesel engine, Appl. Therm. Eng. 111, 1353–1364. [Google Scholar]
Dey S., Reang N.M., Majumder A., Deb M., Das P.K. (2020) A hybrid ANN-Fuzzy approach for optimization of engine operating parameters of a CI engine fueled with diesel-palm biodiesel-ethanol blend, Energy 202, 117813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Awad Omar I., Mamat R., Ali O., Azmi W.H., Kadirgama K., Yusri I.M., Leman A.M., Yusaf T. (2017) Response Surface Methodology (RSM) based multi-objective optimization of fusel oil-gasoline blends at different water content in SI engine, Energy Convers. Manage. 150, 222–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Simsek S., Uslu S. (2020) Experimental study of the performance and emissions characteristics of fusel oil/gasoline blends in spark ignited engine using response surface methodology, Fuel 277, 118182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yusri I.M., Mamat R., Azmi W.H., Omar A.I., Obed M.A., Shaiful A.I.M. (2017) Application of response surface methodology in optimization of performance and exhaust emissions of secondary butyl alcohol-gasoline blends in SI engine, Energy Convers. Manage. 133, 178–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tang Q., Jiang P., Peng C., Duan X., Zhao Z. (2021) Impact of Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol (ABE) and gasoline blends on the energy balance of a high-speed spark-ignition engine, Appl. Therm. Eng. 184, 116267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Anderhofstadt B., Spinler S. (2020) Preferences for autonomous and alternative fuel-powered heavy-duty trucks in Germany, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 79, 102232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Guo Z., Yu X., Li G., Sun Y., Zhao Z., Li D. (2020) Comparative study of different injection modes on combustion and particle emission of Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol (ABE) and gasoline in a dual-injection SI engine, Fuel 281, 118786. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Taghavifar H., Mardani A., Mohebbi A., Taghavifar H. (2014) Investigating the effect of combustion properties on the accumulated heat release of DI engines at rated EGR levels using the ANN approach, Fuel 137, 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rehman S., Mohandes M. (2008) Artificial neural network estimation of global solar radiation using air temperature and relative humidity, Energy Policy 36, 2, 571–576. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Uslu S., Celik M.B. (2020) Performance and exhaust emission prediction of a SI engine fueled with I-amyl alcohol-gasoline blends: An ANN coupled RSM Based Optimization, Fuel 265, 116922. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ghobadian B., Rahimi H., Nikbakht A.M., Najafi G., Yusaf T.F. (2009) Diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis using waste cooking biodiesel fuel with an artificial neural network, Renew. Energy 34, 4, 976–982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Aydın M., Uslu S., Çelik M.B. (2020) Performance and emission prediction of a compression ignition engine fueled with biodiesel-diesel blends: A combined application of ANN and RSM based optimization, Fuel 269, 117472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Roy S., Banerjee R., Bose P.K. (2014) Performance and exhaust emissions prediction of a CRDI assisted single cylinder diesel engine coupled with EGR using artificial neural network, Appl. Energy 119, 330–340. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bhowmik S., Paul A., Panua R., Ghosh S.K., Debroy D. (2018) Performance-exhaust emission prediction of diesosenol fueled diesel engine: An ANN coupled MORSM based optimization, Energy 153, 212–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Alrugaibah M., Yagiz Y., Gu L. (2021) Use natural deep eutectic solvents as efficient green reagents to extract procyanidins and anthocyanins from cranberry pomace and predictive modeling by RSM and artificial neural networking, Sep. Purifi. Technol. 255, 117720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bezerra M.A., Santelli R.E., Oliveira E.P., Villar L.S., Escaleira L.A. (2008) Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry, Talanta 76, 5, 965–977. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Alam M.A., Ya H.H., Azeem M., Hussain P.B., Salit M.S.B., Khan R., Arif S., Ansari A.H. (2020) Modelling and optimisation of hardness behaviour of sintered Al/SiC composites using RSM and ANN: A comparative study, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9, 6, 14036–14050. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sharma V.K., Kumar V., Joshi R.S. (2020) Parametric study of aluminium-rare earth based composites with improved hydrophobicity using response surface method, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9, 3, 4919–4932. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Simsek S., Uslu S. (2020) Investigation of the effects of biodiesel/2-EthylHexyl Nitrate (EHN) fuel blends on diesel engine performance and emissions by Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Fuel 275, 118005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.