Open Access
Issue
Sci. Tech. Energ. Transition
Volume 81, 2026
Article Number 5
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2026007
Published online 03 April 2026
  • Pratik T., Anurag T., Atul K. (2024) GREENSKY: A fair energy-aware optimization model for UAVs in next-generation wireless networks, Green Energy Intell. Transp. 3(1), 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2023.100130. [Google Scholar]
  • Po-Cheng C., Po-Yen C., Yi-Hua L., Jing-Hsiao C., Yi-Feng L. (2015) A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic generation systems operating under fast-changing environments, Solar Energy 119, 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.07.006. [Google Scholar]
  • Madhu G.M., Chintamani V., Chirag N.M. (2021) Adaptive step size based drift-free P&O algorithm with power optimiser and load protection for maximum power extraction from PV panels in stand-alone applications, IET Renew. Power Gener. 15, 6, 1270–1285. [Google Scholar]
  • Bairami S., Salimi M., Mirabbasi D. (2023) A novel method for maximum power point tracking of the grid-connected three-phase solar systems based on the PV current prediction, Chin. J. Electron. 32, 2, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.23919/cje.2021.00.218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elgendy M.A. (2016) Comparative investigation on hill climbing MPPT algorithms at high perturbation rates, in 7th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), Hammamet, Tunisia, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IREC.2016.7478939. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiwei Z., Liqun S., Pengwei L., Hangchen G. (2018) Modified hill climbing MPPT algorithm with reduced steady-state oscillation and improved tracking efficiency, J. Eng. 17, 1878–1883. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.8337. [Google Scholar]
  • Ez-Zghari M., Smail C., El Youssfi N., Tarik Z.K., El Khadiri A.T. (2022) Optimized energy output from a PV system using a modified incremental conductance algorithm for rapidly changing insolation, in: Motahhir S., Bossoufi B. (eds.), Digital technologies and applications, Springer, Cham, pp. 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02447-4_67. [Google Scholar]
  • Sheikh S.H.A., Karami M., Gholami M., Mirzaei R. (2022) Improving MPPT performance in pv systems based on integrating the incremental conductance and particle swarm optimization methods, Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng. 46, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-021-00459-0. [Google Scholar]
  • Ibrahim S.M., Pei C.C., Dawit F.T., Ramadhani K.S., Kuo L.L., Jia-Fu L. (2022) An enhanced grey wolf optimization algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control under partial shading conditions, IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc. 3, 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJIES.2022.3179284. [Google Scholar]
  • Ali M.E., Al-Saud M.S., Abokhalil A.G., Farh H.M.H. (2020) Simulation and experimental validation of fast adaptive particle swarm optimization strategy for photovoltaic global peak tracker under dynamic partial shading, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 124, 109719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109719. [Google Scholar]
  • Abdelilah C., Aboubakr E.H., Saad M., Abdelaziz E.G., Aziz D. (2021) Development of an improved gmppt based on scanning method for PV system operating under a dynamic partial shading conditions, Technol. Econ. Smart Grids Sustain. Energy 6, 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40866-021-00118-7. [Google Scholar]
  • Muhammad H.Z., Noman M.K., Adeel F.M., Majad M. (2021) Bio-inspired optimization algorithms based maximum power point tracking technique for photovoltaic systems under partial shading and complex partial shading conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 309, 127279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127279. [Google Scholar]
  • Mashhood H., Alhazmi W.H., Zakri W. (2022) A fuzzy rule based control algorithm for MPPT to drive the brushless DC motor based water pump, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst 42, 2, 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189767. [Google Scholar]
  • Azer P., Emadi A. (2020) Generalized state space average model for multi-phase interleaved buck, boost and buck-boost DC-DC converters: Transient, steady-state and switching dynamics, IEEE Access 8, 77735–77745. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2987277. [Google Scholar]
  • Pei L., Meng X., Li X. (2024) A novel digital-controlled current-mode single-inductor-multiple-output buck converter with individual output overload protection, IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 32, 957–961. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVLSI.2023.3343763. [Google Scholar]
  • Lotfizadeh H., Layeghi M. (2014) Design and performance analysis of a small solar evaporative cooler, Energy Efficiency 7, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9199-5. [Google Scholar]
  • Samar J., Salman A. (2011) Evaporative cooling as an efficient system in Mediterranean region, Appl. Therm. Eng. 31, 14–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.04.026. [Google Scholar]
  • Bin Z., Chunmei G., Tong C., Qi S., Jian L., Yuwen Y. (2019) Development of an experimental validated model of cross-flow indirect evaporative cooler with condensation, Appl. Energy 252, 113438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113438. [Google Scholar]
  • Bowman N., Lomasl K., Cook M., Eppel H., Ford B., Hewitt M., Cucinella M., Francis E., Rodriguez E., Gonzalez R., Alvarez S., Galata A., Lanarde P., Belarbi R. (1997) Application of passive downdraught evaporative cooling (PDEC) to non-domestic buildings, Renewable Energy 10, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Belarbi R., Ghiaus C., Allard F. (2006) Modeling of water spray evaporation: application to passive cooling of buildings, Sol. Energy 80, 1540–1552. [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Turki A.M., Zaki G.M. (1991) Energy saving through intermittent evaporative roof cooling, Energy Build. 17, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz S.L. (2000) Evaporative cooler solar retrofit kit, U.S. Patent 6101716. [Google Scholar]
  • Kittas C., Bartzanas T., Jaffrin A. (2001) Greenhouses evaporative cooling: measurement and data analysis, Trans ASAE 44, 3, 683–689. [Google Scholar]
  • Khandelwal A., Talukdar P., Jain S. (2011) Energy savings in a building using regenerative evaporative cooling, Energy Build. 43, 581–591. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.